Unwrap.Fund
Unwrap both →
Fund comparison · from official SEC filings

FEBP vs NOVP: how much do they overlap?

PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - February and PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - November
Holdings overlap
100%
of assets, by weight
Shared positions
2
of 2 / 2 holdings
FEBP expense ratio
0.50%
net, per year
NOVP expense ratio
0.50%
net, per year
FEBP and NOVP are largely redundant — holding both means most of your money tracks the same underlying companies.
Shared holdings
Company
FEBP
NOVP
?
—CBOE GLOBAL MARKETS, INC.
99.15%
99.43%
?
—(PIPA070) PGIM Core Government Money Market Fund
0.85%
0.57%
Only in FEBP
Nothing exclusive.
Only in NOVP
Nothing exclusive.
Hold FEBP and NOVP together? See your combined true holdings, overlap, and blended fees — free, no signup.
Unwrap your portfolio →
Other comparisons you might like
FEBP vs JANPPGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - January
100% overlap
NOVP vs OCTPPGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - October
100% overlap
FEBP vs AUGPPGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August
100% overlap
NOVP vs JULPPGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - July
100% overlap
FEBP vs APRPPGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - April
100% overlap
FEBP vs JULPPGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - July
100% overlap
Data source: official SEC Form N-PORT filings from each fund. Fund holdings are disclosed quarterly and may reflect a 60-day reporting delay.
Informational and educational only — not investment advice.
FEBP vs NOVP: 100% holdings overlap — Unwrap.Fund